July 27, 2009

Algae: The next biofuel bet

Hundreds of millions of dollars are being spent on pond scum as a future source of renewable energy

Paul Woods was 22 and studying genetics at the University of Western Ontario when he realized that under certain conditions some species of algae naturally produce small quantities of ethanol.

It was 1984, oil prices appeared to be heading higher, and Woods wondered whether pond scum could be genetically engineered to produce large volumes of the renewable fuel as an alternative to gasoline. The Toronto-born biology student needed some expert advice, so he tracked down plant biologist John Coleman at the University of Toronto and laid out his wish list.

"He basically walked into my lab and asked, `Do you think this is a possibility?' " recalls Coleman, a senior professor in the university's department of cell and systems biology. "I sat down, thought about it for a little while, and we started coming up with more ideas."

Twenty-five years later, Woods, now 47, is founder and chief executive of Florida-based Algenol Biofuels and Coleman is its chief scientific officer. No longer are they just mucking around in the lab. Algenol announced last month a partnership with chemical powerhouse Dow Chemical to build and operate a demonstration algae-to-ethanol plant at one of Dow's manufacturing sites in Texas.

Algae, it appears, are the new green in the quest for a sustainable biofuel that can run cars, put airplanes in the sky and be made into shopping bags. Dozens of start-ups have sprung out of universities, government labs and corporate R&D divisions, all hoping to break the world's addiction to oil in a way that's economical and doesn't compete against food production. More significantly, corporate titans – Dow Chemical just one among them – are entering the game.

It came as a surprise earlier this month when ExxonMobil, the world's largest oil company, said it would invest $600 million (U.S.) to research and develop algae-derived oil, and possibly billions of dollars more to commercialize a product.

Honeywell International, through its subsidiary UOP, has been working with Boeing, Airbus and major airlines since 2008 to create a new kind of jet fuel derived from algae oil. Its process was developed under contract with the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to create renewable fuels for the military. The green fuel was successfully tested last month on two engines used in small jetliners.

Algenol is keeping its focus on ethanol. It has developed strains of blue-green algae – also known as cyanobacteria – that are genetically enhanced to create sugars when exposed to sunlight and carbon dioxide. Enzymes within each microbe have been boosted to convert as much of the sugar as possible into ethanol, which naturally seeps out of the algae cells and is collected.

Dow plans to populate its 24-acre site in Texas with 3,100 "photobioreactors," horizontal chambers about 1.5 metres wide and 15 metres long. The algae would be "fed" a constant stream of CO2 pumped in from a neighbouring Dow chemical facility. The algae would grow in salt water within the reactors, each capable of holding 4,000 litres.

The goal: produce 380,000 litres of ethanol a year. Dow can use ethanol to replace fossil fuels in the production of ethylene, a chemical feedstock for the manufacture of plastics. Andrew Liveris, chairman and chief executive of Dow, calls the initiative a "ground-breaking alternative energy project."

The wave of interest has been a long time coming, says Woods, calling the work he and Coleman did during the 1980s and 1990s a "glorified hobby" with little market value at the time. Oil prices began falling again in the late 1980s and the concept of "peak oil" was on hardly anyone's radar screen. Woods couldn't sit back and wait for a market to emerge; he had to get on with making a living.

In 1989, he ended up forming Toronto-based natural gas marketer Alliance Gas Management, one of the first companies in Ontario to take advantage of market deregulation. It grew to 300,000 customers before being merged into Direct Energy in 1999. Woods then moved to the United States and founded a similar company called United Gas Management, which ran into financial troubles and was sold. All the while, he was working on the algae-to-ethanol project on the side.

It wasn't until oil prices started to creep up again and climate-change issues began to grab headlines that he saw an opportunity with algae.

In the spring of 2006, he decided to formally establish Algenol as a company.

"It was a confluence of events," he recalls. "You had high oil prices, renewed value in fresh water, and a real concern about CO2 emissions. It was really only algae that could address those issues broadly and directly."

Not that the road ahead will be easy. It's no secret that biofuels – whether ethanol or biodiesel – have gotten a bum rap over the past two years. Most of the ethanol produced in North America today comes from corn, and a fierce debate has emerged over whether prime agricultural land should be used to grow crops for fuel instead of food. Many researchers have also questioned whether corn-based ethanol, taking into account the energy required to grow, harvest and process the corn, offers enough of an energy and environmental payback to make it worthwhile.

The rush to produce biodiesel, meanwhile, has seen rainforests cut down in Indonesia to make room for palm plants. It's a classic case of unintended consequences that some scientists call an ecological disaster. But biofuels themselves aren't the problem, which has more to do with how they're produced, and that's why algae have re-energized interest in this emerging market.

Many algae species can grow in salt water, so there's no draw on fresh water – in fact, fresh water is often a useable by-product.

Algae production doesn't compete with food, and it doesn't require prime agricultural land to grow. By some estimates, it uses one-tenth the land required for growing corn. The biggest challenge is to develop an approach to producing oil or ethanol from algae that can be done at a competitive cost on a massive, global scale.

Most methods to date involve continually growing algae in large open or closed ponds. The algae are then harvested and processed in a way that extracts the natural oils inside the microbe cells.

It's a costly, imperfect process that has hobbled efforts at making the alternative fuel economical.

Better, argue scientists, to let the algae live and design them to secrete the oils or ethanol naturally – allowing us, in a word, to "milk" the algae like we do cows.

"We do not harvest milk from cows by grinding them up and extracting the milk," wrote theoretical biologist Richard Gordon, a professor at the University of Manitoba, in a recently published research paper about diatoms, a type of single-cell algae. "Instead, we let them secrete milk at their own pace, and selectively breed the cattle and alter their environment to maximize the rate of milk secretion. Perhaps we could do the same with diatoms."

Algenol is doing exactly that, but it's not alone. Catilin Inc. of Iowa is taking a similar approach, but like most others is focusing on oil production instead of ethanol.

Exxon, which spent two years searching the world for the best biotechnology partner, ended up hitching its wagon with California-based Synthetic Genomics Inc., whose famous founder Craig Venter has engineered algae cells to secrete oils that are good enough to drop into a refinery with other petroleum streams.

If anyone can perfect the process, it's Venter, the man credited for first sequencing the human genome.

"This is the largest single investment in really trying to produce biofuels on a global basis right now," Venter said at a recent conference with Emil Jacobs, vice-president of R&D with ExxonMobil research and engineering.

Venter says the effort is just as much about macro-engineering as it is micro-engineering of algae. Exxon's role will be crucial if there's any hope of economically taking the oil produced from algae and dropping it into existing petroleum-industry infrastructure. Integration with today's refineries and pipelines will be key to achieving global scale.

"This would not happen without the oil industry stepping up and taking part," he says.

At the same time, Jacobs warned that the excitement around Exxon's involvement should be tempered by a healthy dose of reality.

"This is not going to be easy and there are no guarantees of success," he says.

Editorial: Exxon goes green

Exxon's often sharp-tongued skepticism about alternative fuel technologies would seem to make it an unlikely candidate to bankroll research designed to turn algae into fuel.

But in a hopeful sign that attitudes can change, Exxon just announced its first significant foray into biofuels research, a groundbreaking $600 million investment to turn algae into fuel. Its partnership with Synthetic Genomics, a California firm whose founder is best known for decoding human DNA, could shift biofuels' future away from products culled from food crops.


We're pleased that the Irving-based energy giant has put its considerable financial muscle and credibility behind biofuel technology because U.S. companies have trailed behind European firms in this work. The research needs Big Oil's deep pockets and commitments, and no domestic energy company has deeper pockets and more influence than Exxon.

While there is no guarantee of success – and Exxon says the first large-scale commercial plants to produce algae-based fuels could be five to 10 years away – the investment is well timed.

Right now, dozens of companies and universities are vying to find the most suitable strain of algae, the best way to grow it and how to mass-produce it economically. The federal government also is pressing for renewable energy and biofuel breakthroughs to lessen the nation's dependence on fossil fuels.

Corn-based ethanol, the most common biofuel in the United States, has lost some of its luster in recent months. Corn grown for fuel competes with what is produced for food and feedstock, resulting in shortages and rising grocery prices.


Algae-based fuel production would not interfere with the food cycle; nor would it require fresh or even clean water. It would use less land than corn-based ethanol and would consume carbon dioxide, a contributor to climate change. This opens the possibility for algae-to-fuel research having broader applications on initiatives designed to capture CO2 from cement and power plants.

Exxon also deserves praise for the innovative approach it is taking to this research. Instead of growing a plant that can be used as a fuel, Synthetic Genomics will try to produce an algae strain that can be turned into a hydrocarbon-like liquid and pumped through Exxon's pipelines and refineries and delivered to service stations. This isn't traditional biofuel production, but rather seeks to genetically engineer fuel to be used by cars, truck and planes without significant engine modifications.

Like any smart company, Exxon is looking to make a profit and has astutely picked this particular time and technology to mark its alternative energy turf. The company may have been painfully late to the competition, but now that it's on the field, the Exxon work looks to be a game-changer.

Algae: A promising biofuel

WASHINGTON - SOME call it pond scum, but algae is drawing increasing attention as a source of biofuel that can help replace petroleum or fuels made from crops like corn or soybeans.

The notion of using algae to produce fuel has been around for decades, but has garnered new interest and investment amid a search for energy sources that will limit carbon dioxide emissions blamed for climate change.

Algae has obvious advantages over fossil fuels and biofuels from food-based crops, but has an additional benefit in that it absorbs carbon dioxide, and thus can be used to 'scrub' emissions from coal-burning power plants, for example.

In a sign of the new enthusiasm, ExxonMobil announced in mid-July it would invest up to US$600 million (S$864 million) in an alliance with biotech firm Synthetic Genomics to make a new biofuel from photosynthetic algae.

The biggest US energy firm said it was partnering with the firm headed by Craig Venter, a researcher who founded Human Genome Sciences and Celera Genomics and has worked on projects to sequence the genomes of humans, fruit flies and other organisms.

Dow Chemical announced plans in June to join Algenol Biofuels in a pilot-scale project to use algae and carbon dioxide to produce ethanol fuel.

These investments 'were a great shot in arm for the industry, but you've seen other solid investments', said Mary Rosenthal, executive director of the Algal Biomass Organization, which was formed in 2008 and has some 150 members including big firms such as Boeing and Raytheon.

Ms Rosenthal estimates over US$1 billion is being invested in algae biofuels, saying that 'it shows a lot of promise.' She said over 1,000 participants are expected at the organization's October summit in California. -- AFP

Algae: The ultimate biofuel?

With traditional biofuels under fire for driving up food prices and wreaking environmental havoc, industrialists are stepping up research into algae as a sustainable alternative - but many obstacles remain before algae oil finds its way into our cars and planes.

  • Dec. 2008: EU leaders agree revised directive on renewable energy, agreeing a 10% target for 'green fuels' by 2020 (EurActiv 5/12/08).
  • 5 Dec. 2010: Deadline for all EU countries to comply with new Renewables Directive. Greenhouse gas savings from biofuels to reach minimum 35%.
  • 2012: EU countries to submit first report on national measures taken to respect the sustainability criteria for biofuels.
  • By Dec. 2014: Commission to review greenhouse gas emission saving thresholds for biofuels, taking available technologies into account.
  • 2017: Greenhouse gas savings from biofuels to reach minimum 50%.
  • 2018: Greenhouse gas savings from biofuels to reach minimum 60%.
  • 2018: Commission to present renewable energy roadmap for post-2020 period.
  • 2020: Transport sector mandated to source 10% of its energy needs from renewable energy, including sustainable biofuels and others.

In December 2008, the EU struck a deal to satisfy 10% of its transport fuel needs from renewable sources, including biofuels, hydrogen and green electricity, as part of negotiations on its energy and climate package (EurActiv 05/12/08).

"The mandatory 10% target for transport to be achieved by all member states should […] be defined as that share of final energy consumed in transport which is to be achieved from renewable sources as a whole, and not from biofuels alone," says the final text of the EU Renewables Directive.

The new directive obliges the bloc to ensure that biofuels offer at least 35% carbon emission savings compared to fossil fuels. The figure rises to 50% as of 2017 and 60% as of 2018.

The conditionality is linked to increasing concerns about the sustainability of the so-called first-generation biofuels currently available - such as biodiesel and bioethanol - which are made from agricultural crops (including corn, sugar beet, palm oil and rapeseed).

The directive also states that the EU should take steps to promote "the development of second and third-generation biofuels in the Community and worldwide, and to strengthen agricultural research and knowledge creation in those areas".


Second-generation biofuels facing challenges

With ethanol and biodiesel coming under fire for driving up food prices and putting biodiversity at risk, the EU has committed to 'second-generation' biofuels as a cleaner alternative.

Second-generation biofuels are made from ligno-cellulosic biomass - the "woody" part of plants - that do not compete with food production. Sources include residues from crop and forest harvest such as leaves, tree bark, straw or woodchips as well as the non-edible portions of corn or cane.

However, converting the woody biomass into liquid sugars requires costly technologies involving pre-treatment and fermentation with special enzymes, meaning that second-generation biofuels cannot yet be produced economically on a large scale.

"It is unlikely that second-generation biofuels will be competitive with first generation by 2020," said the European Commission's Joint Research Centre in a 2008 study. And if they do, they will use largely imported biomass anyway, the JRC added, as latest studies indicate there will not be enough wood available to meet energy needs while continuing to supply Europe's existing wood industries.

Algae: High yields, no competition for land

To overcome these problems, some start-ups have now turned to so-called third-generation biofuels.

The United States Department of Energy (DoE) defines those as crops "designed exclusively for fuel production" such as perennial grasses, fast-growing trees and algae. These plants are not normally cultivated for agro-alimentary uses and have a particularly high percentage of biomass, it says.

Chief among those are algae. They are considered the most efficient organisms on earth, because of their rapid growth rate (some species can double their biomass in a day) and their high oil content.

Research into algae for the mass-production of oil is mainly focused on microalgae or phytoplankton – organisms capable of photosynthesis that are less than 0.4 mm in diameter.

"Algae can produce more biomass and more biofuel molecules much more efficiently in time and space than any terrestrial plant," says Greg Mitchell of the Scripps Institute of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego (UCSD). "For example, algae can produce 100 times more vegetable oil per acre per year than soy beans and 10 times more than oil palm," he told WIPO Magazine, a publication of the World Intellectual Property Organisation.

According to US oil giant ExxonMobil, which recently launched a $600 million research and development project on the issue, algae could yield more than 2,000 gallons of fuel per acre per year of production (7,580 litres). Approximate yields for other fuel sources are far lower, it pointed out:

  • Palm — 650 gallons per acre per year (2,463 litres).
  • Sugar cane — 450 gallons per acre per year (1,705 litres).
  • Corn — 250 gallons per acre per year (947 litres).
  • Soy — 50 gallons per acre per year (190 litres).

As a consequence, algae need much less land to grow than conventional biofuels, ending the potential for conflict with food production which comes with increased energy crop cultivation.

No need for freshwater

Algae have many other advantages. Aside from better yields, they are able to grow on ocean or wastewater, avoiding tapping into scarce freshwater resources for irrigation.

Algae grow best in seawater, which comes in virtually unlimited supply, says Raffaello Garofalo, executive director at the European Algae Biomass Association (EABA). And the micro-organism seems to be particularly fond of polluted seawater, which helps it grow at exponential rates.

"In all polluted sea places, there is a phenomenon which happens naturally called eutrophisation, which means there is an over-growth of algae," says Garofalo. "Precisely because pollution brings excess nutrients to the algae and therefore they grow exponentially."

The idea, he says, is to feed polluted water to the algae via transparent plastic tubes which industry specialists call photo-bioreactors. The algae absorb the pollution as a nutrient, and the water can then be returned back to the sea cleaner than when it entered, he explains. In the meantime, the algae have grown into biomass, which can be used for biofuels.

As a result, algae can be grown on so-called marginal lands, such as in desert areas where the groundwater is saline. Besides, they can feed on waste nutrients, including polluted water produced by the oil and gas industries.

Carbon 'recycling'

In addition, microalgae have proved to grow more quickly when fed with carbon dioxide, the main global warming gas. When injected into a photo-bioreactor, the CO2 helps the plant grow faster while at the same time providing a way of "recycling" the CO2.

If algae plants are fitted next to factories or power stations, this could even open prospects for reducing emissions from industry.

"You could for example put algae next to a cement plant or a thermo-electric plant and you inject the carbon coming out of the plant in the bioreactor," Garofalo explains. "This means that the CO2, instead of coming out of the chimney, goes into the bioreactor to produce algae, which is burnt a second time as a fuel and then only goes into the atmosphere. So the same CO2 can be re-used twice."

In Arizona, GreenFuel, a private company, has developed a large-scale algae-to-biofuel plant, which uses CO2 emissions from a nearby power plant, the Arizona Public Service Redhawk power facility. The facility, which opened in 2005, won the 2006 Platts Emissions Energy Project of the Year Award.

Cost the main challenge

However, a number of challenges remain before algae can reach mainstream commercial applications, with uncertainties about cost the greatest obstacle.

Various algae species typically cost between US$5–10 per kg dry weight, according to US reports, with further research looking into ways of reducing capital and operating costs to make algae oil production commercially viable.

Bernard Raemy, executive vice-president at the Carbon Capture Corporation (CCC), a US-based company which claims to be a leader in the nascent algae-based biofuel industry, acknowledges that algae face a string of challenges. Speaking to WIPO Magazine, Raemy said these include "algae harvesting, dewatering, drying, lipid extraction and conversion". "Coordinated research efforts are required to bring research from the lab to the field," he said.

Research challenge: Bringing costs down

In the United States, several R&D activities have taken place since the 1950s. The largest was the Aquatic Species Programme, launched in 1978 by the US Department of Energy (DOE). The programme focused on finding the best strains which produce the highest yield and have the highest lipid content, while resisting fluctuations in temperature, particularly when cultivated in outdoor ponds.

Over 3,000 strains of microalgae were collected and screened, with the number later narrowed down to 300. However, no single strain was found to be perfect for all kinds of climate or water and the programme was closed in 1996, when US gasoline prices went down to $26/litre.

According to a review by the US National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), outdoor mass production of algae in open ponds faces a number of challenges, including:

  • Temperature variations, which affects productivity and growth;
  • Invasion by native microalgae species, which may wipe out the cultivated strain;
  • Water loss due to evaporation, and;
  • Lower lipid content of algae produced in ponds.

When cultivated in photo-bioreactors, other issues come up, mainly:

  • Finding the right type of plastic or glass for the transparent tubes in order to prevent algae from accumulating and obstructing the light;
  • The cost of bringing the water via pipelines when algae are grown in desert areas, and;
  • High maintenance cost of the installations.

It is therefore still an open question whether algae are best grown in photo-bioreactors or in open ponds. And the economics are a large part of the problem, as widespread mass production of algae for biofuel production is being hampered by the cost of the equipment and structures needed to begin growing algae in large quantities.

"For most algae applications we are still in fundamental research," says the EABA's Garofalo. "There is still research in order to identify the algae kinds or families which are most appropriate in order to produce biofuels. There is still research on what is the best bioreactor shape or plastic that is best to do this."

Harvesting and oil extraction

Then comes the question of how to harvest the plants. "Because algae are micro-organisms of a size ten times smaller than hair, you cannot harvest them with a net for example," Garofalo says.

Options for harvesting include centrifugation or chemical flocculation, which pushes all the microalgae together, but there are high costs associated with these processes too.

Whatever the species concerned, harvesting algae and extracting the oil from it appears to be "one the most critical steps" in producing algae-based biofuels, according to research foreseen under the European Commission's FP7 research programme.

The project, called Aquafuels, intends to bring together researchers and industry in order to streamline European algae research in the future.

But with oil prices up again, new research is being carried out with renewed enthusiasm. And genetic modification seems to open entirely new prospects, with new algae strains being tested for their capacity. The US national biofuels action plan, published in October 2008, appears to hedge its bets on genetic engineering: "Third generation feedstocks should be developed to increase drought and stress tolerance; increase fertiliser and water use efficiencies; and provide for efficient conversion," the plan says.

Future profitability lying outside biofuels

According to the European Algae Biomass Association (EABA), the key to future commercial profitability is to understand that there is more to algae than just biofuels production.

"It will never be economically viable to produce biodiesel or bioethanol from algae biomass if we don’t think about the co-products," says the EABA's Garofalo. "For instance, when you produce biodiesel, the lipid or the oil part of the algae represents about 25-30% of the product. But what do you do with the remaining 70%? We call it a by-product but actually it is the same product in terms of weight."

Aside from biofuels and jet fuels, the EABA says other applications include nutrients, pharmaceuticals, animal feed or bio-based products. In all these sectors, the EABA says algae and aquatic biomass hold an outstanding potential to achieve a real revolution towards a fully sustainable economy.

With high oil prices driving the push to find alternatives, oil majors are showing increasing interest in algae fuel.

US oil major ExxonMobil recently launched a $600 million research programme in cooperation with Synthetic Genomics, Inc. (SGI) to develop, test, and produce biofuels from photosynthetic algae.

"While significant work and years of research and development still must be completed, if successful, algae-based fuels could help meet the world’s growing demand for transportation fuel while reducing greenhouse gas emissions," said Michael Dolan, senior vice-president of ExxonMobil.

Dolan said research will focus first on testing different strains of algae for their fuel-making potential. Research there can proceed more rapidly than for other crops with longer lifecycles, he said. The second phase will look into the best method for producing algae on a large scale: open pond, closed pond or photo-bioreactor. The last phase will see the development of "small to midsize plants" with a view to scaling up to a commercial module, which Dolan said could be "five to ten years away".

If successful, bio-oils from photosynthetic algae could be used to manufacture a full range of fuels, including gasoline, diesel fuel and jet fuel, meeting the same specifications as today's products, ExxonMobil said.

In December 2007, Anglo-Dutch oil giant Shell built a research centre in Hawaii to study the commercial viability of selected algae strains. The facility will grow only non-modified, marine microalgae species in open-air ponds using proprietary technology. Shell says algae can double their mass several times a day and produce at least 15 times more oil per hectare than alternatives such as rape, palm soya or jatropha. Some algae species grow so fast that they double their size three or four times in one day, it said, highlighting their potential for large-scale commercial fuel production.

"Algae have great potential as a sustainable feedstock for production of diesel-type fuels with a very small CO2 footprint," said Graeme Sweeney, Shell executive vice-president for future fuels and CO2. "This demonstration will be an important test of the technology and, critically, of commercial viability."

UOP, a subsidiary of Honeywell, and Boeing have teamed up with leading airlines to create the Algal Biomass Organisation (ABO), a trade group which aims to test and develop algae fuels for use in aeroplanes. Air New Zealand, Continental, Virgin Atlantic and Boeing will work together through the new group to push for long-term innovation and investment in algae as an energy form.

By May 2009, Bill Glover, managing director of environmental strategy at Boeing, said the group had concluded four successful test flights using different kinds of biofuel blends, including algae, camelina and jatropha. The international standards board that approves fuels and chemicals could certify the plant-derived biofuels within a year, Glover said, meaning they could be immediately used as a drop-in replacement.

"There is significant interest across multiple sectors in the potential of algae as an energy source and nowhere is that more evident than in aviation," said Glover, who co-chairs the Algal Biomass Organisation (ABO). "Air transportation is a vital contributor to global economic prosperity, but is being threatened by record rises in fuel costs. Together we recognise that algae have the potential to help offset those fuel costs, while also contributing to improved environmental performance for the aviation industry."

In a statement, the Algal Biomass Organisation (ABO) said algae fuels can annually deliver up to 2,000-5,000 gallons of fuel per acre of non-arable land, and can be a central part of an overall strategy to reduce oil dependency, without competing with food crops.

Raffaello Garofalo, executive director of the European Algae Biomass Association (EABA), says there are many potential benefits form using algae in biofuels production, particularly because it does not need to compete with land used for food crops.

But he warns against over-enthusiasm for the technology, saying there are still many obstacles before it can be developed on a commercial scale. And he refuses to be drawn into predictions about when the technology could become commercially viable. "It would not be responsible to give you dates," he told EurActiv in an interview. "What we want to avoid is a kind of Internet bubble where people make speculations about the quantities and prices of microalgae in the future."

"There is a lot of investment in research and this research is driven by the conviction that economies of scale, improvement in yields and output are achievable. It is a matter of time."

Moree Plains Shire Council is about to sign a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Australian owned company Cubic QED, to manufacture biodiesel from

The MOU will allow the company to establish a commercialisation trial in the shire, with a view to building a biodiesel plant.

A total of 2.5 tonnes of algae biomass will produce 12,000 litres of biodiesel, with the dried by-product fed to livestock as a high nutrient supplement.

General manager David Aber says the council wants the biodiesel industry to flourish in the region.

"It's a company looking to establish a production process in Australia. They've had a number of research projects that have been going on in South Australia," he said.

"What they do is they don't consume the water, they actually treat the water as part of the process and it comes back in as clear water at the end of the process and yes by turning it into potable water we're turning [it] into genuine high security water for industrial use."