Airlines Test Biofuels but Costs Are Hurdle; $17 a Gallon
By JACK NICAS
Americans are getting used to burning ethanol in their daily commute. Now, pond scum and french-fry grease could help fuel their next business trip.
On Monday, United Airlines flew from Houston to Chicago with a 40% blend of biofuel made from algae—the first biofuel-powered commercial flight in the U.S. On Wednesday, Alaska Airlines launches the first of 75 flights powered by a 20% biofuel blend made from used cooking oil.
Scientists in recent years have figured out how to make jet fuel from animal fat, garbage, shrubbery and dozens of other substances. But as the new fuels make their way from the lab to 30,000 feet, the economics are proving tricky.
"This is expensive. It's about six times what we normally pay for fuel," said Bill Ayer, chairman and CEO of Alaska Airlines. "So the hope is as this industry develops, and it becomes scalable, the price comes down."
Airlines are eager to fly on fuel that can reduce carbon emissions up to 80% while diversifying the supply of their biggest expense. The price of jet fuel has jumped 87% since 2009 to $3.11 a gallon. But because of small-scale production, renewable jet fuel costs even more.
"The capability's there," said chemist Jose Olivares, executive director of the National Alliance for Advanced Biofuels and Bio-products, a consortium of private companies, universities and laboratories. "Whether we can do it economically and at the same price of petroleum fuels, that's the challenge."
Seattle-based Alaska Air Group Inc., parent of Alaska Airlines, bought 28,000 gallons of biofuel—at $17 per gallon—from Dynamic Fuels in Geismar, La., a joint venture of Tyson Foods Inc. and synthetic-fuel company Syntroleum Corp.
Dynamic mostly makes renewable diesel out of inedible animal parts from Tyson's factories and used cooking oil, some from area restaurants. But its renewable jet fuel—which must be able to withstand more extreme temperatures than diesel or gasoline—is made only as ordered, and the plant won't ramp up production until there's demand to match.
"Before we commit the capital, we've got to understand that the economics support it—versus build it and they will come," said Bob Ames, Tyson's vice president of renewable energy.
In the near term, Alaska Air has no plans of going beyond the pilot project. "It's not feasible economically," Mr. Ayer said. "But we sure hope this adds to the enthusiasm in this fledgling industry."
United, a unit of United Continental Holdings Inc., promised to buy 20 million gallons of biofuel a year starting in 2014, or 0.6% of the airline's 2010 fuel consumption, from Solazyme Inc., the San Francisco-based company that grew the algae for United's biofuel flight on Monday. The airline stipulated the biofuel must reduce carbon emissions by at least 50% and be "cost competitive."
"We're not in a position to afford paying a premium for jet fuel," said Jimmy Samartzis, United's global sustainability director.
Airlines are depending on a $510 million investment from the U.S. departments of Agriculture, Energy and the Navy to jump-start biofuel production to a commercial scale. The program aims to fund new biofuel plants and create a ready market—the Navy's vehicles and aircraft—for renewable diesel and jet fuel. It will start doling out grants next year.
"We see this as a way to create a new industry," Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said.
For 50 years, ASTM International, the international body of experts that approves fuels, sanctioned only one way to make jet fuel; it begins with crude oil. In 2009, ASTM approved a way that could start with natural gas, coal and many types of biomass, or organic matter like trees. In July, the body approved a third, more efficient technique that uses the oils in plants or animals.
The final product of the new methods is interchangeable with the fuel airplanes use today, meaning biofuel can mix freely with conventional fuel when transported, stored or burned. Because renewable jet fuel lacks sufficient weight and lubricity, international standards discourage airplanes from using more than 50% biofuel.
ASTM is also vetting a method to make jet fuel from alcohol, which would open the market to ethanol producers that are further along in production than biofuel start-ups, partly because of government mandates for ethanol in gasoline. Jet fuel made from ethanol wouldn't need to be mixed with conventional fuel. The fuel passed initial U.S. Air Force tests.
At least seven international airlines have flown commercial flights using biofuel, including Germany's Deutsche Lufthansa AG, which in July began flying passengers eight times a day between Hamburg and Frankfurt using a 50% biofuel blend in one of two engines on the plane.
Because biofuel can be made from such an array of sources, industry leaders envision a regional supply chain where local feedstocks—such as the camelina plant in the Pacific Northwest and sugar cane in Brazil—are used to make the fuel for nearby airports. The system would cut transportation costs and carbon emissions, and better distribute the industry's economic benefits.
Boeing Co., which has been a leading biofuel proponent, has set a public goal for biofuel to compose 1% of the industry's fuel supply by 2015.
Beginning next year, international airlines will have an extra incentive to meet that goal: the European Union will begin charging airlines for certain levels of carbon emissions while awarding credits for using biofuel that reduces emissions by at least 35%. The aviation industry, which accounts for about 2% of the world's carbon emissions, has pledged to cut its emissions by 2050 to half of what they were in 2005.
Alaska Air Group estimates if it used the 20% biofuel blend for all its flights for one year, the emissions savings would be equivalent to taking nearly 64,000 cars off the road.
Original article available here.
No comments:
Post a Comment